❌

Reading view

There’s Safe. And There’s Safer With McAfee: Transformational Protection

For a long time, being safe online came with a relatively familiar set of rules.

“Don’t click suspicious links.”
“Keep your software updated.”
“Be careful about what you share.”

But today, AI is everywhere. And it’s rapidly evolving and drastically changing what it means to trust what we see and hear online. It can make scams more convincing and easier to create at scale, while personal information available online can make those scams feel remarkably specific to us.

As AI reshapes nearly everything we consume and do, our daily interactions all come with an added mental burden: the feeling that you have to question everything.

Our research found that nearly three-quarters of Americans (74%) feel the need to double-check most things online before trusting them.

That finding stuck with me because it captures something bigger than concern about any one cyberthreat: Trust itself is becoming time-consuming work.

In a world where normal, everyday interactions put people at risk, consumers need protection that keeps them safe in every moment, feels simple, and works quickly and proactively.

Meet the new McAfee: a completely transformational safety solution that protects you when you know you need it, and when you don’t.

Always On. Simple and Easy. Personalized and Proactive.

This marks a shift from reactive security to proactive safety that helps you identify risks and take action before any damage is done.

I experienced a great example of it recently. I was getting on a plane and connected to the public Wi-Fi. McAfee let me know that my VPN had automatically turned on to help protect my connection.

I didn’t have to remember to take a security step. I didn’t have to search for a setting or wonder whether I had done the right thing. I didn’t have to know that I should be securing my connection on public Wi-Fi. And I didn’t have to know what a “VPN” is (virtual private network for those who are wondering!) The protection was simply there when I needed it. Always on. Simple and easy. Personalized and proactive.

That small moment captured something much bigger about the experience we want to create.

Scammers will start taking it personally

McAfee has been protecting people for decades, and for many, our name is still synonymous with antivirus. But in a world of accelerating AI, people’s digital lives no longer fit neatly inside a single device, and neither do the risks they encounter.

That’s why the new McAfee experience is designed to do much more than protect individual devices. It helps protect the things people rely on every day, including their personal information, connections, devices, and accounts, while making it clearer what’s safe, what needs attention, and what McAfee can handle for them.

McAfee’s new product experience seamlessly protects your personal info, finances, connections and devices so you can shop, text, bank and browse with confidence, delivering advanced and comprehensive protection at every moment.

This is merely an evolution of what McAfee has always been here to do: keep people safe- from today’s threats and tomorrow’s.

McAfee. Safer Than Safe.

Our new brand is an expression of that same evolution.

Safe is reacting. Safer is preventing.

Safe is worrying about tomorrow. Safer is enjoying today.

Those contrasts capture what Safer Than Safe means to us. It’s about giving consumers greater confidence instead of building on decades of fear associated with scams, malware, risks, alerts, and the protection industry broadly.

With the growing concern over AI and the speed at which it’s evolving, there has never been a more important moment to provide critical safety solutions proactively and simply. And that’s the moment we’re meeting.

That thinking shaped a McAfee brand that is brighter, simpler, and more human. The experience of being protected shouldn’t be defined by warnings and complexity, and neither should the brand behind it.

McAfee’s “Safer Than Safe” brand promise, the new experience simplifies security into one holistic safety solution:

  • Simple & Easy – McAfee’s new experience does the hard work for you. Consumers no longer need to understand complex threats, technical language or how and where to find tools or settings to turn on the protections they need.
  • Personalized, Proactive Assistance – Designed to help consumers stay a step ahead with proactive notifications, clear guidance and easy steps. McAfee surfaces timely and personalized alerts when your information or devices are at risk, with guided actions that explain what is happening and what to do next in plain, easy-to-understand language.
  • Always-On, Unified Product – McAfee protects you everywhere you are and whatever you’re doing. The new experience brings data, identity and threat protection together into one connected experience across all your devices, so staying safe is seamless and easy.

AI will continue to change how we create, communicate, and connect. It will bring extraordinary possibilities and new risks. We cannot expect people to study every development closely enough to recognize every new way their trust might be tested.

Consumers shouldn’t be security experts. That’s our job.

McAfee. Safer Than Safe.

The post There’s Safe. And There’s Safer With McAfee: Transformational Protection appeared first on McAfee Blog.

  •  

What Scams Look Like in Your State: A 50-State Breakdown

No matter where you live in the U.S., AI-driven scams and deceptive content are increasingly filling our feeds, alerts, and inboxes with moments that make us stop and ask: “Is this real?”

But the scams and threats Americans encounter aren’t the same everywhere. Where you live can shape the types of scams reaching your devices, how often you encounter them, and even how those experiences affect the way you behave online.

This 50-state breakdown combines McAfee consumer research with McAfee Labs data to show how Americans are experiencing scams, how those experiences are affecting trust and behavior online, and which text-based scams are reaching devices across the country.

The consumer findings come from a nationally representative survey of 5,000 U.S. adults, with 100 respondents in each state. The survey explores people’s exposure to scams, financial losses, changing online behaviors, concerns about AI and the mental effort involved in deciding what to trust online.

Alongside those findings, McAfee Labs analyzed text-based scam activity across the U.S. from May through July 2026. That data provides a view into the volume, concentration and types of scam texts McAfee observed in each state during the three-month analysis period.

Together, the two datasets offer different views of the same problem: what people say they are experiencing and how it affects them, alongside the scam activity McAfee is seeing in the wild.

Infographic - USA Map Dominant Scam Category by State

Alabama

Key takeaway: Alabama had the highest scam-text rate per device in McAfee’s analysis, while scam concerns are also changing how residents behave online.

  • 66% say figuring out what’s real online takes more mental energy than it did a year ago.
  • 60% check whether something online is legitimate at least weekly.
  • 19% say they do that checking several times a day.
  • 45% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 83% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 64% have avoided an unfamiliar retailer because of scam concerns.
  • 42% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email because they feared a scam.
  • 41% have avoided trying a new app, website or service.
  • 39% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • Investment and cryptocurrency scams were the leading text-scam category detected in Alabama.

McAfee detected 5.14 scam texts per device, the highest rate in the country.

Alaska

Key takeaway: Alaska has one of the widest gaps between rising trust fatigue and active checking: 54% report more mental effort, but only 44% verify online content at least weekly.

  • 54% say figuring out what’s real online takes more mental energy than a year ago.
  • 44% check online legitimacy at least weekly.
  • 13% say they check several times a day.
  • 44% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 82% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 48% have avoided an unfamiliar retailer.
  • 39% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 40% have avoided trying a new app, website or service.
  • 34% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams were the leading text-scam category detected in Alaska.

Arizona

Key takeaway: Arizonans are feeling a pronounced trust burden, with 65% saying it now takes more mental energy to decide what’s real online.

  • 65% report greater mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 60% check online legitimacy at least weekly.
  • 17% check several times a day.
  • 41% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 81% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 43% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 44% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 31% have avoided trying a new app, website or service.
  • 39% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Arizona’s text-scam volume.

Arkansas

Key takeaway: Arkansas residents are relatively active verifiers: 64% check online legitimacy at least weekly even though only about half report greater mental strain.

  • 51% say figuring out what’s real online takes more mental energy.
  • 64% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 22% check several times a day.
  • 38% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 77% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 46% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 42% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 32% have avoided trying a new app, website or service.
  • 32% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Arkansas text-scam volume.

California

Key takeaway: California has one of the heaviest trust burdens in the survey: 72% say figuring out what’s real online now takes more mental energy.

  • 72% report greater mental effort deciding what’s real online.
  • 58% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 20% check several times a day.
  • 41% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 83% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 49% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 43% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 32% have avoided trying a new app, website or service.
  • 38% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • Among Californians surveyed who lost money to scams, 72% recovered none of it.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led California’s  text-scam volume. 

Colorado

Key takeaway: Colorado’s clearest signal is concern about AI-enabled scams, shared by 85% of residents surveyed.

  • 59% report greater mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 56% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 15% check several times a day.
  • 38% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 85% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 42% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 45% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 35% have avoided trying a new app, website or service.
  • 34% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Colorado’s text-scam volume.

Connecticut

Key takeaway: Connecticut residents report rising trust fatigue, yet fewer than half say they verify online content every week.

  • 57% say figuring out what’s real takes more mental energy.
  • 47% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 18% check several times a day.
  • 35% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 79% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 33% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 36% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 26% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 24% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Connecticut’s text-scam volume.

Delaware

Key takeaway: Delaware stands out for exposure to synthetic imagery, with 46% encountering an AI-generated image presented as real.

  • 53% report greater mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 53% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 8% check several times a day.
  • 46% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 80% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 47% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 34% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 30% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 33% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Delaware’s text-scam volume.

Florida

Key takeaway: Floridians are active online reality-checkers, with 63% verifying messages, offers, websites or people at least weekly.

  • 56% report greater mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 63% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 18% check several times a day.
  • 43% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 85% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 43% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 37% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 42% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 27% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Florida text-scam volume.

From our McAfee Labs Research: This shows approximate location of all the scams received
From our McAfee Labs Research: This shows approximate location of all the scams received

Georgia

Key takeaway: Georgia had the second-highest scam-text-per-device rate highlighted by McAfee, at 4.67.

  • 59% report greater mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 60% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 25% check several times a day.
  • 33% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 80% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 40% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 37% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 27% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 35% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • McAfee detected an average of 4.67 scam texts per device.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Georgia’s text-scam volume. 

Hawaii

Key takeaway: Hawaii had the country’s highest scam intensity among affected devices: those receiving at least one scam text averaged 8.45 over three months.

  • 56% report greater mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 54% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 13% check several times a day.
  • 38% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 81% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 47% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 38% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 37% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 37% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • Affected devices averaged 8.45 scam texts, the highest figure nationally.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Hawaii’s text-scam volume. 

Idaho

Key takeaway: Idaho shows a sizeable trust gap: 62% report greater mental effort deciding what’s real, while 49% verify online content weekly.

  • 62% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 49% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 13% check several times a day.
  • 43% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 82% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 48% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 35% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 40% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 38% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Idaho’s text-scam volume.

Illinois

Key takeaway: Two-thirds of Illinois residents say deciding what’s real online is taking more mental energy than a year ago.

  • 66% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 59% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 18% check several times a day.
  • 39% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 75% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 40% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 26% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 32% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 24% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Illinois text-scam volume.

Indiana

Key takeaway: Indiana’s scam anxiety is translating into caution: 81% are concerned about AI making scams harder to recognize and 60% verify online content weekly.

  • 62% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 60% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 18% check several times a day.
  • 46% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 81% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 38% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 41% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 35% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 35% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Indiana text-scam volume.

Iowa

Key takeaway: Iowa residents report relatively restrained checking behavior: 47% verify online content at least weekly despite 55% reporting greater mental effort.

  • 55% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 47% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 17% check several times a day.
  • 33% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 81% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 43% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 32% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 33% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 34% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Iowa text-scam volume.

Kansas

Key takeaway: Kansas has one of the bleakest recovery pictures in the survey: 75% of scam victims who lost money recovered none of it.

  • 61% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 51% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 10% check several times a day.
  • 40% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 80% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 42% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 39% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 40% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 32% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • 75% of victims who lost money said they recovered none of it.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Kansas text-scam volume.

Kentucky

Key takeaway: Kentucky is the standout verification state: 76% say they check whether online content is legitimate at least weekly.

  • 62% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 76% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 19% check several times a day.
  • 41% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 83% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 46% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 30% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 39% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 25% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Kentucky text-scam volume.

Louisiana

Key takeaway: Louisiana combines comparatively low trust fatigue with severe financial consequences: 73% of victims who lost money recovered none of it.

  • 45% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 54% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 13% check several times a day.
  • 35% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 75% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 43% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 37% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 32% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 30% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • 73% of victims who lost money said they recovered none of it.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Louisiana text-scam volume.

Maine

Key takeaway: Maine is one of only two states where toll and traffic scams, rather than investment and crypto scams, ranked first in McAfee’s text telemetry.

  • 64% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 59% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 13% check several times a day.
  • 39% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 81% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 46% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 34% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 34% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 30% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Toll and traffic violation scams were Maine’s leading text-scam category.

Maryland

Key takeaway: Marylanders show particularly high concern about AI-enabled fraud, with 86% saying AI is making scams harder to recognize.

  • 65% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 60% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 25% check several times a day.
  • 45% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 86% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 46% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 45% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 37% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 44% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Maryland text-scam volume.

Infographic - How Scams Are Affecting Americans 2

Massachusetts

Key takeaway: Massachusetts has a striking trust gap: 65% report more mental effort deciding what’s real, but only 48% verify online content at least weekly.

  • 65% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 48% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 15% check several times a day.
  • 46% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 86% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 47% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 35% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 37% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 38% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Massachusetts text-scam volume.

Michigan

Key takeaway: Michigan joins Maine as the only state where toll and traffic scams outranked investment and cryptocurrency scams.

  • 71% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 52% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 21% check several times a day.
  • 43% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 71% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 40% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 35% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 34% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 32% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Toll and traffic violation scams were Michigan’s leading text-scam category.

Minnesota

Key takeaway: Minnesota records the highest AI-scam concern in the state crosstabs, at 91%.

  • 60% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 59% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 10% check several times a day.
  • 47% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 91% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 44% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 44% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 38% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 34% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Minnesota text-scam volume.

Mississippi

Key takeaway: Mississippi had one of the heaviest scam-text loads in McAfee’s analysis, averaging roughly 4.64 scam texts per device.

  • 55% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 54% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 17% check several times a day.
  • 32% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 82% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 43% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 34% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 34% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 35% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • McAfee detected roughly 4.64 scam texts per device.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Mississippi text-scam volume.

Missouri

Key takeaway: Missouri residents show a confidence problem around AI scams: 13% said they were not at all confident spotting AI-created or AI-enhanced fraud.

  • 63% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 60% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 16% check several times a day.
  • 41% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 85% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 43% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 40% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 39% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 35% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • 13% said they’re not at all confident they could spot a scam enhanced by AI

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Missouri text-scam volume.

Montana

Key takeaway: Montana has the highest reported exposure to AI-generated images presented as real, at 51%.

  • 63% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 49% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 11% check several times a day.
  • 51% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 84% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 47% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 44% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 43% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 37% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Montana text-scam volume.

Nebraska

Key takeaway: Nebraska’s strongest signal is AI concern: 87% say AI is making online scams harder to recognize.

  • 56% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 50% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 8% check several times a day.
  • 43% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 87% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 41% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 35% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 40% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 29% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Nebraska text-scam volume.

Nevada

Key takeaway: Nevada has the broadest reported scam exposure in the survey, with 95% encountering at least one type of scam in the past year.

  • 60% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 66% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 18% check several times a day.
  • 43% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 82% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 45% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 33% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 32% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 33% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • 95% encountered at least one type of scam in the past year.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Nevada text-scam volume.

New Hampshire

Key takeaway: New Hampshire shows another trust gap: 59% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real, while 46% verify online content weekly.

  • 59% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 46% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 10% check several times a day.
  • 48% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 85% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 50% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 34% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 37% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 33% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led New Hampshire text-scam volume.

New Jersey

Key takeaway: New Jersey residents report unusually frequent scam exposure, with 30% saying they encounter four or more scam attempts on a typical day.

  • 61% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 61% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 18% check several times a day.
  • 43% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 82% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 49% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 34% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 37% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 36% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • 30% report encountering at least four scam attempts on a typical day.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led New Jersey text-scam volume.

New Mexico

Key takeaway: New Mexico has one of the toughest scam-recovery pictures: 72% of victims who lost money recovered none of it.

  • 65% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 59% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 16% check several times a day.
  • 39% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 79% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 42% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 48% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 38% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 44% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • 72% of victims who lost money said they recovered none of it.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led New Mexico text-scam volume.

New York

Key takeaway: New York’s most striking behavioral signal is comparatively low retailer avoidance: 33% have stayed away from unfamiliar sellers because of scam concerns.

  • 59% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 58% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 19% check several times a day.
  • 41% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 78% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 33% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 37% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 27% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 27% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led New York text-scam volume.

Displays the number of scams seen per unique device
Displays the number of scams seen per unique device

North Carolina

Key takeaway: North Carolina stands out on recovery: 42% of scam victims who lost money said they recovered all of it.

  • 53% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 65% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 17% check several times a day.
  • 33% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 69% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 38% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 38% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 29% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 29% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • 42% of victims who lost money reported recovering all of it.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led North Carolina text-scam volume.

North Dakota

Key takeaway: North Dakota had the country’s highest concentration of scams in analyzed text traffic, at 2.8%.

  • 61% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 55% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 13% check several times a day.
  • 46% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 83% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 48% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 40% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 40% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 37% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • 2.8% of analyzed text traffic was classified as scams, the highest share nationally.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led North Dakota text-scam volume.

Ohio

Key takeaway: Ohio stands out for financial harm: 41% of respondents say they lost money to an online scam in the past year.

  • 59% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 63% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 20% check several times a day.
  • 46% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 73% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 44% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 33% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 33% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 30% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • 41% report losing money to an online scam in the past year.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Ohio text-scam volume.

Oklahoma

Key takeaway: Oklahoma consumers are feeling the mental load of navigating AI-powered scams: 85% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize, while half say figuring out what’s real online requires more mental effort.

  • 56% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 19% check several times a day.
  • 47% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 85% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 50% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 46% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 39% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 43% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • 10% say they never spend time checking whether online content is legitimate.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Oklahoma text-scam volume.

Oregon

Key takeaway: Oregon scam concerns are spilling into ordinary digital life, with 45% avoiding new apps, websites or services.

  • 57% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 49% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 17% check several times a day.
  • 41% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 85% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 52% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 45% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 45% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 39% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Oregon text-scam volume.

Pennsylvania

Key takeaway: Pennsylvania has one of the heavier trust burdens in the survey, with 67% saying figuring out what’s real takes more mental energy.

  • 67% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 54% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 14% check several times a day.
  • 39% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 85% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 48% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 38% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 37% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 31% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Pennsylvania text-scam volume.

Rhode Island

Key takeaway: Rhode Island scam concerns are affecting legitimate online behavior: 42% have avoided clicking a real message or link.

  • 58% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 57% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 11% check several times a day.
  • 45% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 84% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 40% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 37% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 36% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 42% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Rhode Island text-scam volume.

South Carolina

Key takeaway: South Carolina has a confidence problem around AI scams: 13% say they are not at all confident identifying AI-created or AI-enhanced fraud.

  • 57% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 47% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 12% check several times a day.
  • 44% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 79% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 43% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 42% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 38% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 39% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • 13% say they are not at all confident identifying AI-created or AI-enhanced fraud.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led South Carolina text-scam volume.

South Dakota

Key takeaway: South Dakota’s scam response is relatively restrained compared with many states, with 35% avoiding unfamiliar retailers and 29% avoiding legitimate links.

  • 55% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 52% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 11% check several times a day.
  • 41% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 78% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 35% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 37% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 38% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 29% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led South Dakota text-scam volume.

Tennessee

Key takeaway: Tennessee residents report rising trust fatigue without matching verification habits: 59% feel more mental strain, but 48% verify weekly.

  • 59% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 48% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 15% check several times a day.
  • 40% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 80% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 48% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 33% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 35% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 37% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Tennessee text-scam volume.

Texas

Key takeaway: Texas is one of the more active verification states, with 62% checking online legitimacy at least weekly.

  • 61% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 62% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 22% check several times a day.
  • 46% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 81% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 41% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 30% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 32% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 30% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Texas text-scam volume.

Infographic describing state-by-state threat data

Utah

Key takeaway: Utah has one of the highest levels of exposure to AI-generated imagery, with 49% seeing an AI image presented as real.

  • 58% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 50% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 8% check several times a day.
  • 49% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 85% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 43% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 40% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 43% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 32% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Utah text-scam volume.

Vermont

Key takeaway: Vermont has a sizeable trust-versus-action gap: 58% report more mental effort online while 47% verify content weekly.

  • 58% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 47% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 12% check several times a day.
  • 45% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 79% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 47% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 28% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 32% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 30% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Vermont text-scam volume.

Virginia

Key takeaway: Virginia reports comparatively low exposure to AI-generated images presented as real, at 34%, even as concern about AI scams remains high.

  • 58% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 54% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 15% check several times a day.
  • 34% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 83% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 40% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 33% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 39% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 30% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Virginia text-scam volume.

Washington

Key takeaway: Washington has one of the highest levels of AI-scam concern in the survey, at 86%.

  • 62% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 55% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 15% check several times a day.
  • 40% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 86% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 50% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 36% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 34% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 36% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Washington text-scam volume.

West Virginia

Key takeaway: West Virginia has one of the lower weekly verification rates in the survey, at 45%, despite a majority reporting greater trust fatigue.

  • 55% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 45% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 12% check several times a day.
  • 43% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 81% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 41% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 25% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 29% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 31% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led West Virginia text-scam volume.

Wisconsin

Key takeaway: Wisconsin shows relatively high exposure to synthetic imagery: 46% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.

  • 56% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 49% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 15% check several times a day.
  • 46% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 85% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 39% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 35% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 26% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 26% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Wisconsin text-scam volume.

Wyoming

Key takeaway: Wyoming has the most distressing scam-loss recovery story in the survey: 76% of victims who lost money recovered none of it.

  • 64% report more mental effort figuring out what’s real online.
  • 52% verify online content at least weekly.
  • 11% check several times a day.
  • 49% have encountered an AI-generated image presented as real.
  • 78% are concerned AI is making scams harder to recognize.
  • 44% have avoided unfamiliar retailers.
  • 41% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email.
  • 43% have avoided a new app, website or service.
  • 31% have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.
  • 76% of victims who lost money said they recovered none of it.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams led Wyoming text-scam volume.

The post What Scams Look Like in Your State: A 50-State Breakdown appeared first on McAfee Blog.

  •  

Your State’s Scam Reality: What New Research Reveals Across All 50 States

There is a small tax many of us pay in our everyday interactions without even realizing it.

A package notification arrives, and we stop to check whether we actually ordered something. A recruiter reaches out about a job, but before replying, we research the person and the company. A bank alert appears, and instead of tapping the link, we open the banking app ourselves.

These are sensible habits. But McAfee’s latest research suggests the effort behind them is increasing the average American’s every day mental load.

Nearly three-quarters of Americans (74%) say they feel the need to double-check most things online before trusting them. Sixty-two percent say figuring out what is real takes more mental energy than it did a year ago.

That growing burden is one reason McAfee is introducing a new brand and product experience built around a broader idea of what protection should do. Good security shouldn’t demand more of people’s attention. It should help give some of it back.

That’s why the new McAfee experience is designed to do more than protect individual devices. It helps protect the things people rely on every day, their personal information, connections, devices, and accounts, all while making it clearer what’s safe, what needs attention, and what McAfee can handle for them.

New McAfee Experience - iPhone Mockup

Get quick alerts and easily update protections in McAfee’s app

That matters at a moment when attention is already stretched thin. AI is everywhere, and it has made it easier to produce convincing content at an enormous scale, adding to an already crowded attention economy. Increasingly, ordinary moments come with an extra question: Is this real?

And those questions have consequences. Our research found that 82% of Americans have changed how they behave online because of scams. Some have stopped buying from unfamiliar retailers. Others have ignored communications that turned out to be legitimate. Eighteen percent say scam concerns have even caused them to avoid responding to a job opportunity.

“I’ve accused my doctor’s office of being an AI,” says McAfee Threat Researcher Charles McFarland, recounting a time when even he thought something legitimate was fraudulent. “I had to apologize.”

Financial losses remain a serious part of the picture. Nearly one-third of Americans (31%) reported losing money to a scam in the past year. But measuring scams only in dollars misses something important. Scams are also making trust more expensive.

This report examines that growing cost: the attention Americans are spending figuring out what to trust, how the scam experience differs across all 50 states, and what protection should look like when staying safe increasingly competes for the same limited time and attention as everything else we do online.

Infographic - USA Map Dominant Scam Category by State

Key Findings

McAfee’s research combines a nationally representative survey of 5,000 U.S. adults, with 100 respondents in every state, and McAfee Labs analysis of text-based scam activity across the U.S.

Together, the findings show how scams are affecting not only Americans’ wallets, but also their attention, trust and behavior online.

Scams are placing a growing burden on Americans’ attention. Nearly three-quarters (74%) say they feel the need to double-check most things online before trusting them, while 62% say figuring out what is real takes more mental energy than it did a year ago. (Survey)

That uncertainty is changing legitimate online behavior. Eighty-two percent say scam concerns have changed something they do online. Forty-four percent have avoided buying from an unfamiliar retailer, 37% have ignored a legitimate call, text or email, 34% have avoided a new app, website or service, 33% have avoided a legitimate link and 25% have abandoned an online purchase. (Survey)

Scams can make real opportunities harder to trust. Twenty-seven percent encountered a fake recruiter or job opportunity in the past year. At the same time, 18% say scam concerns have caused them to avoid responding to a job opportunity. (Survey)

Financial losses are widespread, and getting money back can be difficult. Nearly one-third of Americans (31%) report losing money to a scam in the past year. Among those who lost money, 53% recovered none. In Wyoming, Kansas, Louisiana, California and New Mexico, more than 70% of victims who lost money recovered nothing. (Survey)

Investment and cryptocurrency scams dominate text-based scam activity. McAfee Labs found them to be the leading scam-text category by volume in 47 of 50 states from May through July 2026. Maine, North Dakota and Michigan were the exceptions. In Maine and North Dakota, toll and traffic scams ranked first. Meanwhile, in North Dakota, loan and investment scams ranked first. (McAfee Labs)

The volume and intensity of scam texts varies considerably by state. Alabama averaged 5.14 scam texts per device, the highest in McAfee’s analysis. In North Dakota, scams represented 2.8% of analyzed text traffic, the highest concentration nationally. In Hawaii, devices receiving at least one scam text averaged 8.45 scam messages during the three-month analysis period. (McAfee Labs)

Some states experience especially high exposure or financial consequences. Ninety-five percent of Nevada respondents encountered at least one type of scam in the past year. In Ohio, 41% reported losing money to a scam. Thirty percent of New Jersey respondents say they encounter four or more scam attempts on a typical day. North Carolina stood out in the other direction: 42% of victims who lost money said they recovered all of it. (Survey)

Many scam texts are designed to begin a conversation rather than complete the scam immediately. Joining or clicking through to a WhatsApp group was the most common requested action in the scam texts McAfee analyzed, driven largely by investment and cryptocurrency schemes. The initial message may be only the first step in a longer attempt to build trust before asking for money. (McAfee Labs)

Displays the number of scams seen per unique device

Displays the number of scams seen per unique device

The New Scam Landscape

Scams no longer occupy some separate, obviously suspicious corner of the internet. Increasingly, they imitate the ordinary business of being online.

In its analysis of U.S. text-based scams from May through July 2026, McAfee Labs identified 49 leading scam topics across 23 broader categories. They touched nearly every part of daily life: package deliveries and bank accounts, job offers and investments, shopping and subscriptions, health and utilities, relationships and family emergencies.

Example of one of the many types of delivery text scams consumers face Example of one of the many types of delivery text scams consumers face

The full list spans Cloud Storage & Payment; Package & Delivery; Banking & Financial; Toll & Traffic Violation; Tax & IRS; Legal Threat & Law Enforcement; Government Impersonation; Tech Support & Security; Prize & Lottery; Romance & Relationship; Employment & Job Offer; Subscription & Service; Account Verification & Account Alerts; Investment & Cryptocurrency; Charity & Donation; Utility & Bill Payment; Health & Pharmacy; Family & Friend Emergency; Retail & Shopping; Loan & Debt Relief; Buying Property & Real Estate; Context-Free Links & Phone Numbers; and Other.

That breadth matters. The more scams resemble the normal messages people receive every day, the more ordinary life requires verification.

One category nevertheless dominated. Investment and cryptocurrency scams were the largest text-scam category by volume in 47 of 50 states. Only Maine, North Dakota and Michigan broke the pattern, with toll and traffic violation scams as well as loan and investments ranking first.

The prevalence of investment scams is important because many are not trying to steal money with a single text. They are trying to start a relationship.

The most common action requested in the scam texts analyzed by McAfee was clicking or joining a WhatsApp group, driven heavily by investment and cryptocurrency schemes. A message might promote an investing community or offer access to financial advice.

Example of a scam text attempting to move users to WhatsApp Example of a scam text attempting to move users to WhatsApp

Moving the recipient into a group or private conversation gives the scammer more time to establish credibility before money enters the picture. Plus, for many of us, social apps feel more personal and we more easily let our guard down when we move a conversation to these messaging platforms.

That helps explain why an unsolicited text that looks relatively harmless can still be the beginning of a much longer scam.

Other prominent scams rely on a different tactic: urgency. Fake account alerts can suggest that something needs immediate attention. Toll and traffic scams warn of an unpaid charge or violation. McAfee Labs also saw scammers impersonating T-Mobile with fake reward offers among the largest individual scam topics.

Example of a scam text attempting to move users to WhatsApp Example of scammers exploiting trusted brands like T-Mobile to dupe customers

The stories change, but the underlying objective is often the same. Scammers want people to act before they have time to question what they are seeing. And there is a lot to question.

Across the United States

McAfee’s analysis found meaningful differences in the amount of scam traffic reaching consumers around the country during the three month analysis period. Alabama recorded an average of 5.14 scam texts per device, the highest in the analysis. Georgia followed at 4.67, with Mississippi close behind at 4.64.

North Dakota stood out in a different way. There, scams represented 2.8% of all text traffic McAfee analyzed, the highest concentration in the country. Hawaii showed another pattern: among devices that received at least one scam text, the average was 8.45 scam messages during the three-month period. That was about 15% higher than Alabama, which ranked second at 7.35 scam texts per exposed device.

Rank  State  Scams per device  State  Scams per device scammed 
1  Alabama  5.14  Hawaii  8.45 
2  Georgia  4.67  Alabama  7.35 
3  Mississippi  4.64  Ohio  7.29 
4  Nevada  4.54  Florida  7.29 
5  Tennessee  4.50  North Dakota  7.28 

A third measure shows how concentrated scam traffic was within people’s overall text messages. North Dakota had the highest concentration in the country, with scams accounting for 2.8% of all text traffic McAfee analyzed.

These measures capture different dimensions of the same problem. The all-device average shows how many scam texts reached devices across a state overall. The exposed-device average shows how persistent scam activity was for devices that received at least one scam. And the share of total text traffic shows how prominent scam messages were within the broader messaging environment.

This shows each states top scam category by volume if Investments & Cryptocurrency scams are ignored. Notice these colors don’t necessarily match the colors from the previous graph.

This shows each states top scam category by volume if Investments & Cryptocurrency scams are ignored. Notice these colors don’t necessarily match the colors from the previous graph.

For consumers, those distinctions may be invisible. What they experience is repetition: another message asking for attention and another decision about whether it deserves it.

AI raises the stakes further. It can make convincing scam content cheaper and faster to produce, while people are simultaneously encountering more AI-generated material in everyday online life. The result is an environment where the old advice to simply “look for something suspicious” becomes harder to apply reliably. Sometimes the suspicious thing looks perfectly ordinary.

That is why the next phase of consumer protection cannot depend on people becoming infinitely better at scrutinizing everything themselves.

America’s Scam Reality

McAfee’s consumer research shows what happens when that scam environment meets everyday life.

Most Americans are encountering scams regularly. Eighty-eight percent say they experienced at least one type of scam in the past year, and one in five say they typically encounter four or more scam attempts in a single day.

Yet frequency tells only part of the story. The more consequential finding may be what people are doing in response.

Eighty-two percent say scam concerns have changed their online behavior. Forty-four percent have avoided an unfamiliar retailer. Thirty-seven percent have ignored a legitimate call, text or email because they suspected a scam. Thirty-three percent have avoided clicking a legitimate message or link.

These are not examples of people falling for scams. They are examples of people trying not to.

Job scams make that tradeoff particularly tangible. Twenty-seven percent of Americans say they encountered a fake recruiter or job opportunity in the past year. Eighteen percent say concerns about scams have caused them to avoid responding to a job opportunity.

The financial consequences remain substantial when a scam does succeed. Nearly one-third of Americans (31%) report losing money to a scam in the past year. Among those victims, 53% recovered none of what they lost.

From our McAfee Labs Research: This shows approximate location of all the scams received

From our McAfee Labs Research: This shows approximate location of all the scams received

But a national average can obscure how differently people experience the problem.

Our full 50-state scam breakdown examines the data state by state, combining McAfee’s consumer survey with Labs telemetry to show where scam exposure is highest, where financial recovery is hardest, how concerns affect behavior, and which types of text scams McAfee is seeing across the country.

Across those differences, one finding remains remarkably consistent: Americans are adapting. They are checking more carefully and approaching unfamiliar interactions with greater caution, or even avoiding them altogether.

Those behaviors can help keep people safe. But that puts the mental load on back onto the everyday user. There is a limit to how much vigilance we should expect people to supply on their own.

The better question is how technology can take on more of that work for them. And that is the thinking behind McAfee’s new brand and product experience, beginning its rollout in the U.S. today.

How McAfee is Changing to Meet the Moment

McAfee’s new consumer experience is designed to make protection simpler to understand and easier to act on, while helping people navigate the moments where scams and other threats increasingly create uncertainty.

We’ll let you know if something seems suspicious and could put you at risk.

The experience is built to spot risks earlier, guide people clearly, and act when protection can be handled automatically. That means flagging suspicious messages, links, sites, exposed data, or unsafe connections; explaining what matters in plain language; and helping people take the right next step without requiring them to become security experts.

McAfee can alert you when your information appears in a data breach, help identify suspicious messages and links, protect your connection on risky Wi-Fi, monitor for exposed personal information, and help keep your devices and accounts safer.

Just as importantly, we’ve worked to make those protections understandable.

Instead of expecting people to know cybersecurity terminology or hunt through settings, the experience is designed to surface what matters and help people understand what to do next.

Because good protection shouldn’t create another job for you.

The refreshed McAfee experience makes it easier to see what needs your attention and how you’re protected.

The refreshed McAfee experience makes it easier to see what needs your attention and how you’re protected.

What We’re Unveiling

That idea, making protection do more of the work, is built into the new McAfee experience we’re unveiling today.

We’ve brought protection for personal information, connections, and devices into one connected experience across PC, Mac, mobile, and tablet. Instead of asking people to piece together what’s protected or search for what needs attention, McAfee makes it easier to see both in one place.

The experience is also more personal. McAfee can alert you when your information or devices may be at risk and provide guided actions, that explain what needs your attention in plain language. The goal is not to give people more security information. It’s to help them understand what matters to them and what they can do about it.

And over time, the experience is designed to become more personal and relevant to each person, proactively identifying risks, alerting in the moment, and guiding when action is needed for the protections that matter most based on their digital life.

We’ve also made improvements to privacy tools like Online Account Cleanup, which now helps people prioritize higher-risk accounts, and Personal Data Cleanup, which makes it easier to see the personal information being found and removed on their behalf.

Taken together, these changes reflect where we believe consumer safety needs to go: less hunting through settings, less deciphering security alerts, and less relying on people to spot every threat themselves.

More protection that understands what matters, explains what needs attention, and works proactively in the background.

Here to give you peace of mind and lighten the mental load of life online.

Here to give you peace of mind and lighten the mental load of life online.

Conclusion

The findings in this report suggest that the impact of scams extends beyond exposure and financial loss.

Every scam adds another small decision to an already crowded digital day: Is this message real? Is this link safe? Is this person who they say they are? As those decisions multiply, staying safe online becomes not just a security challenge, but a growing mental burden.

As people encounter more attempts to imitate legitimate messages, businesses and opportunities, the effort required to establish trust becomes a consequence in its own right.

That makes reducing the burden of verification an increasingly important part of consumer protection. People should not have to devote more of their limited attention to staying safe simply because scams are becoming harder to distinguish from everyday life online. That’s where McAfee comes in.

The post Your State’s Scam Reality: What New Research Reveals Across All 50 States appeared first on McAfee Blog.

  •  
❌