The ACLU is suing two Florida police departments over the arrest of a Fort Myers man in a child-abduction case, saying officers treated a flawed face-recognition match as a near-certain ID.

From anti-drone tech to face recognition, 2026 World Cup stadiums in the US, Canada, and Mexico are subjecting fans to an array of surveillance tech. Here’s what you need to know.

Most US World Cup stadiums are surrounded by surveillance cameras. Want to know if you’re being watched on your way to a match? These maps will help you.

The organization claims that the FIFA tournament could have impacts on the rights of local people and visiting soccer fans in all three host countries.

Every organisation gets audited. The question is who does the auditing.

Anthropic is releasing Claude Mythos 5 to trusted organizations and Claude Fable 5 to the public, a version it says can’t be used for cyberattacks.

Discover how AI-driven vulnerability discovery is reshaping the cybersecurity landscape. Learn why foundational hardening and proactive threat detection are now essential for defending against zero-day threats in the post-AI era.

Signal insists that plans to compel tech companies to scan devices for nude images of children announced by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday at London Tech Week "will not keep children safe." "It endangers us all," the encrypted messaging platform said, adding that the mechanism required to implement it would be "dangerous." And it wouldn't be a pro-privacy statement without calling it "dystopian." Signal argues that the proposed technology could at some point be repurposed to enable state-sponsored surveillance of all citizens' comms, or used as a mass censorship tool. "Forcing all UK residents to prove their age and/or have all their content scanned, simply to exercise their fundamental right to communicate, is a perilous proposition," Signal stated. "We know that mass surveillance and censorship capabilities, however sincere-sounding the promises of those who initiate them are, never remain narrowly scoped. Once created, they will be expanded, forming a dangerous tool that will be wielded both in the UK and abroad to censor and surveil whatever they might consider 'threats' or 'harmful content.'" Similar accusations have been leveled against the UK government in response to its various attempts to improve online safety via legislation. For example, the government has long presented the Investigatory Powers Act as a way to enshrine in law necessary powers available to law enforcement and UK intelligence to intercept communications for the sake of preventing terrorist attacks. More recently, the Online Safety Act was introduced to impose new obligations on digital platforms to prevent children from accessing online harms. However, privacy proponents have shunned both. Rather than simply providing powers to prevent terror attacks, critics say the IPA enables public bodies to spy on people's calls or texts. It's colloquially known as "The Snooper's Charter." Digital rights organizations have also claimed the OSA is more about online censorship than it is about restricting the types of content children are allowed to view on the web. The PM's proposals are not law yet. Instead, Starmer's speech amounted to a three-month ultimatum to tech companies: make the changes the UK wants to see or the government will legislate. Essentially, whichever way the likes of Apple, Google, Microsoft, and others want to play it, some form of device-level scanning appears likely to be pushed onto UK devices soon. "When it comes to the safety of our children, standing by is not an option. Nobody gets a free pass. That is why I'm making sure Britain is the first country in the world to make it impossible for children to take, share or view nude images," Starmer said. "And I expect tech firms to make that happen. This is not an impossible challenge – these are some of the most innovative companies in the world. But if they choose not to, then we will act and change the law." The government's announcement was backed by a slew of campaigners and charities that argued child protection has not been as big a part of tech innovation as it should have been in recent years. Roxy Longworth, author and founder of Behind Our Screens, said: "I told myself, back in 2021, that if I went public with what happened to me and it stopped one life from being ruined, then it was worth it, but the more I campaigned the angrier I became. "Every child needs to be protected from platforms who for far too long have been allowed to turn a blind eye to the damage being done to them. This announcement makes me hopeful that there won't be kids sat in their room feeling the same pressure and shame that consumed my teenage years." Likewise, Chris Sherwood, chief exec at the NSPCC, said: "Every day these protections are not in place, more children will continue to face devastating harm in the online world. That's why we strongly support the government's decision to make it mandatory for these companies to block inappropriate material at device level. This marks a major step forward in our fight against online child sexual abuse." The UK government singled out Apple and Google, saying that it demands both block nudity by default across their devices. That includes cameras, third-party apps, and messaging services, which would prevent children from taking, viewing, or sending nude images. It proposed that the nude-block-by-default approach would keep children safe, while still allowing adults to remove the block by verifying their ages. Client-side scanning remains a highly controversial technology, but supporters present it as striking a balance between privacy and safety. Advocates argue it should appeal to the pro-privacy crowd by keeping all data on the device, rather than blurring nude images in transit, for example, which would involve sending that data to an intermediary. However, in the case of Signal, an encrypted messenger, it breaks the private comms trust model, even if the message content is not sent to a third party. Client-side scanning can involve checking content against a database of known objectionable material. In the context of child exploitation, image hashes would be checked against a database of other hashes associated with abuse material. If the hashes match, then the image would be blocked. Some implementations scan using AI, rather than against a database. So while the image in this scenario is not sent to a third party, it does mean that Signal could no longer say that message content stays between sender and receiver only. Further, because the databases of objectionable material would need to be updated, this introduces additional problems. Updated databases or models would need to be pushed to devices, creating another trust and security dependency. The attack surface also widens, as it is conceivable that attackers could try to manipulate them. As Signal points out, it would be technically possible for the same scanning mechanisms to be updated to block other things, like messages criticizing the government, to take one hypothetical example. Authorities could also feasibly implement ways of seeing which device contains images or other content that has registered matches with its objectionable material database, potentially opening the door to surveillance. The company's statement [PDF] called for public funds to be funneled into other areas to improve child safety, including education, social services, and guardrails on AI technologies and platforms, instead of drafting legislation to block children's nudes by default on devices. "What the UK government wants instead is invisible surveillance infrastructure, switched on by default and potentially rushed into law under cynical pretexts," it said. "All of this with scant care for the actual needs of the children they claim to be protecting or the horrifying and far-ranging consequences that will ensue in practice." Signal has not threatened to pull out of the UK, however, despite the government's promises to enact the plans, via legislation or the threat of it. The company has previously mulled exiting Sweden over proposed encryption-busting laws, and more recently Canada, as it debates a bill that would compel platforms like Signal to gather its users' metadata, which could include their locations and who they are talking to. ®

Google has fixed its fifth actively exploited Chrome zero-day of 2026, and this one earned its finder a $55,000 bounty. The flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-11645, is an out-of-bounds memory access bug in Chrome's V8 JavaScript engine. Google confirmed that the vulnerability is being exploited in the wild, but has disclosed little beyond the bare technical details. The company patched the issue in the latest Stable Channel releases for Windows, macOS, and Linux. It also awarded a $55,000 bounty to the researcher using the handle "303f06e3," who reported the bug on April 27. The reward suggests Google viewed the report as potentially serious, particularly given its location in V8, the JavaScript engine at the heart of Chrome. Bugs in V8 have featured regularly in both Chrome security advisories and exploit chains over the years, making it one of the browser's more closely watched components. As is standard when active exploitation is involved, Google has withheld technical details that could help others carry out the attack before users have had a chance to patch. CVE-2026-11645 is the fifth exploited Chrome zero-day fixed this year. Google started 2026 by patching CVE-2026-2441, a use-after-free flaw in CSS. Two more zero-days followed in March, CVE-2026-3909 and CVE-2026-3910, before another actively exploited vulnerability, CVE-2026-5281, was patched in April. For Google's browser engineers, 2026 is shaping up to be another busy year. The company patched eight Chrome zero-days across all of 2025, and it’s already more than halfway to that figure with more than six months still to go. There is no indication that the latest flaw has been used in broad, indiscriminate attacks. Zero-days are often reserved for targeted operations until patches become available, after which researchers and criminals alike begin dissecting the fixes to understand what changed. For Chrome users, the advice remains much the same as it was after the first four zero-days this year: restart the browser, install the update, and avoid giving attackers an unnecessary head start. ®

Simplify your security with Cisco SASE with Meraki. Easily integrate SD-WAN with SSE for fast, automated protection across your hybrid network.

Most people don’t get scammed because they ignore warning signs. 

They get scammed because they find a reason to explain those warning signs away. 

The website looks a little off, but the deal is incredible. The text message is unexpected, but they’re already waiting for a package. The seller is unfamiliar, but the discount is too good to pass up. 

That’s what makes major shopping events such fertile ground for scammers.  

New McAfee research suggests that economic pressure may be making that problem worse, as 40% of consumers say they would trust a lower priced deal without verifying it. That means as costs are climbing, shoppers are less likely to second guess a too-good-to-be-true deal that could be a scam. 

“Anyone who has ever fallen for a scam thought they would recognize one first,” McAfee’s Head of Threat Research Abhishek Karnik reminds shoppers. 

“That confidence is part of what scammers count on,” he says. “Tools like McAfee exist precisely for those moments, flagging suspicious links, messages, and offers in real time, before a split-second decision becomes a costly one.” 

New McAfee Research Reveals the Cost of Deal Hunting 

While most shoppers believe they can spot a scam, McAfee’s new research suggests many are engaging in behaviors that increase their risk. 

Rising Prices Are Driving Riskier Shopping Decisions 

Economic pressure is changing how people shop online. 

McAfee found: 

• 82% prioritize finding the cheapest deal when shopping online 
• 55% spend more time hunting for deals 
• 40% would trust a lower-priced deal without verifying it first 
• 29% would skip researching a seller if the deal seemed especially good 
• 27% are more likely to consider unfamiliar sellers because of lower prices 
• 23% feel pressure to act quickly before deals disappear 

The same behaviors that help shoppers find bargains can also make them more vulnerable to fraud. 

“What the data reflects is that economic pressure has effectively done some of the scammer’s work for them,” says Karnik. “When consumers are already primed to move quickly and prioritize price over authenticity, it takes far less effort to push them toward a bad click or a fraudulent purchase.” 

Shopping Scams Are Already Costing Americans Real Money 

The financial impact is significant: 

• 37% say they have lost money due to online shopping scams or fraud 
• 45% of victims lost more than $100 
• 25% lost between $100 and $499 
• 20% lost $500 or more 
• 36% were unable to recover any of their money 

AI Is Making Shopping Scams Harder to Spot 

Consumers are increasingly aware that artificial intelligence is changing the scam landscape. 

According to McAfee research: 

• 70% agree AI-generated content is making shopping scams harder to identify 
• Nearly three-quarters have encountered shopping content they believed was suspicious or AI-generated 

“The signs people have historically relied on, poor grammar, low-quality images, obviously off branding, are no longer reliable,” advises Karnik. “AI has lowered the production cost of a convincing fake to nearly zero.” 

It’s not just a fake landing page fraudsters are creating.  

“AI is being used to make fake review sections, impersonation messages that look exactly like it came from a major retailer, realistic logos, believable URLS,” Karnik says. “When you’re shopping online, you need to adjust your expectations to match that new AI reality.” 

What Are the Most Common Shopping Scams During Major Sales Events? 

Scammers follow consumer attention. 

Whenever millions of people are searching for deals at the same time, scammers create fake websites, impersonate retailers and delivery companies, and use urgency to pressure shoppers into acting before they think. 

Here are some of the most common shopping scams consumers encounter during major sales events, as well as the red flags consumers can watch for: 

Scam Type	How It Works	Red Flags
Fake shopping websites	Fraudulent websites mimic real retailers and disappear after collecting payments	Prices far below competitors, little company information, newly created websites
Fake social media ads	Ads promote products that never arrive or are counterfeit	Too-good-to-be-true discounts, limited reviews, unfamiliar brands
Delivery notification scams	Fake package alerts claim there is an issue with your shipment	Unexpected texts, suspicious links, requests for payment
Retailer impersonation scams	Messages claim there is a problem with your account or order	Urgent language, login requests, unfamiliar sender addresses
QR code scams	QR codes redirect shoppers to fraudulent websites	Codes placed on flyers, posters, packages, or public locations
Brushing scams	Unsolicited packages arrive at your home	Items you never ordered, requests to scan codes or leave reviews
Fake recall scams	Messages claim a recent purchase has been recalled	Requests for payment, account credentials, or personal information

 According to McAfee research, consumers most commonly report encountering fake shipping notifications, delivery scams, retailer impersonation scams, account alerts, and suspicious discount offers during major shopping periods. 

How McAfee Can Help 

With McAfee+ Premium, multiple layers work together before any damage is done:  

• Scam Detector flags suspicious texts, emails, links, QR codes, and even deepfake videos before you engage 
• Secure VPN keeps your data private, especially on public Wi-Fi  
• Web Protection helps block risky sites, even if you do accidentally click  helps block risky sites, even if you do accidentally click   
• Password Manager doesn’t just help you make unique, strong passwords, it keeps them stored and organized for you
• Device Security helps detect malicious apps or downloads   
• Identity Monitoring alerts you if your personal info shows up where it should not, so you can act fast   
• Personal Data Cleanup helps remove your information from sites selling it. 
• Online Account Cleanup assists in taking down your old, forgotten accounts across the web 
• Social Privacy Manager helps you monitor and change privacy settings across your social platforms in just a few clicks 

Together, these protections are designed to address the broader range of online risks people face every day. 

Plus, click here to get McAfee’s limited-time deals on real-time protection this Amazon Prime Day, from June 23 to June 26.

About our consumer research 

McAfee surveyed 1,000 U.S. adults in May 2026 as part of a broader study of 5,000 respondents across the U.S., UK, France, Germany, and Japan, focused on online shopping intentions, scam awareness, and purchase behaviors. 

The post New Research: Rising Costs Are Driving Consumers to Ignore Scam Instincts for Better Deals appeared first on McAfee Blog.

French officials are investigating a compromise of the government’s encrypted messaging service Tchap after attackers hijacked an account and gained access to public chat rooms. The incident came to light on June 7 when France's National Cybersecurity Agency (ANSSI) detected suspicious activity on Tchap, the government's homegrown messaging service used across ministries and public sector organizations. The French Digital Affairs Directorate (DINUM), which operates the platform, said it immediately began investigating the compromise and moved to block the affected account. French officials insist the damage was limited and said the attacker could only see messages posted in public chat rooms, which are accessible to all Tchap users. Private conversations, the government says, are encrypted, and their contents remain inaccessible even when an account is compromised. Not everyone is buying that version of events. A cyber criminal has claimed responsibility for the attack and said they were able to gain access after they “social engineered” a valid agent account associated with Tchap's education environment. The alleged hacker claims they accessed more than 73,000 user accounts, 643,000 messages, nearly 60,000 media files, and hundreds of chat rooms. The post, shared by Dark Web Intelligence, also claimed user enumeration was possible through a directory search function and suggested the data included references to documents marked "Diffusion Restreinte," a French government restricted-distribution classification. None of those claims have been independently verified, and DINUM's statement makes no mention of user directory exposure, restricted documents, or the volumes of data cited by the hacker. What French officials have confirmed is that investigators are still working through logs to determine exactly which conversations were accessed and whether any data was exfiltrated. The agency has also notified France's data protection watchdog, CNIL, after determining that personal information may have been exposed through content shared in conversations accessible to the attacker. “A message has been sent to all Tchap users reminding them that a public chat room can be found and joined by any user and that its content is not encrypted,” French officials added. “In accordance with Tchap's terms of service, no personal, sensitive, or confidential information should be exchanged in public chat rooms: such exchanges should be reserved for private chat rooms.” Whether the incident amounts to a limited exposure of public chat rooms or something considerably larger will depend on what investigators find in the logs, but for now, the government and the attacker are telling very different stories. ®

There's another likely North Korean-linked scam hitting developers and their employers, while snarfing up credentials and cryptocurrency - and this one doesn't even involve embedding IT workers at high-profile tech giants. A previously unseen phishing crew, suspected to have DPRK ties, sent more than 250 emails to people working in almost 100 organizations, mostly based in the US, over six weeks in April and May. According to security sleuths, it is yet another digital-heist attempt designed to steal cryptocurrency wallets and developers’ credentials. Proofpoint threat researchers spotted this campaign and tracked the digital thievery as UNK_DeadDrop. Like earlier phishing expeditions from the Norks, including the Contagious Interview campaign, this one uses developer recruitment or code review lures to target victims, primarily in technology, education, business services, and financial services, and ultimately steal credentials and cryptocurrency. In another common tactic seen with DPRK-linked credential-stealing activities, the lures attempt to send victims to attacker-controlled GitHub repositories hosting malicious scripts that execute cross-platform malware across macOS, Linux, and Windows machines. “However, there are several differences between the activity sets, such as the shift in social engineering from arranging fake interviews to unsolicited job offer or code review approaches as well as the move from delivery platforms such as LinkedIn to email,” researchers Saher Naumaan and Carlos Rubio said in a Monday blog, citing other differences between UNK_DeadDrop and Contagious Interview. “Based on the use of email for initial access, the high volume of emails, industrialization and scale of repository creation, a new self-contained payload, and distinct infrastructure from previous Proofpoint observations of Contagious Interview campaigns, Proofpoint Threat Research continues to track UNK_DeadDrop activity as an independent cluster,” the researchers wrote. Full-stack engineer wanted The attacks begin with an email that looks like it originated from a real company, with job offers for developer roles including “Full-Stack Engineer” or “Agent Lead Developer” positions. Proofpoint caught the crooks spoofing a handful of companies to send these emails from attacker-owned sender domains including: Ondo Finance: a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform Empower Pharmacy: a pharmaceutical company NXLog: a log collection and centralization tool OnePlan: a strategic portfolio and work management platform Hypen Connect: a Web3 and AI Talent Agency Valon: a mortgage service provider Nourish: a telehealth company The emails contain links to GitHub repos disguised as coding assignments or cryptocurrency-related projects - part of the phony job application process. All of the emails instructed the target to clone the repository and open it in a code editor like VS Code or Cursor. Proofpoint’s report lists all 10 repositories, all focused on four themes - cryptocurrency platforms, exploit archives, Foundry testing, and AI payments - and all hosted by different GitHub accounts, so be sure to check out the vendor’s list. In May, the attackers switched tactics and began sending victims requests for peer reviews on open-source projects, with a potential job offer based on the fixes. These emails purported to come from cryptocurrency trading or prediction companies, including Pulsynk and Trixauvex. Another UNK_DeadDrop campaign in late May targeted finance and technology companies, requesting recipients to test an ERC-4626 vault in Foundry, a toolkit for Ethereum and smart contract development. In all of these instances, when the victim opens what they believe to be a legit repository folder in an integrated development environment, a pre-configured task silently executes and triggers a platform-specific loader that decodes embedded payloads on whatever system the developer uses, working across Linux, macOS, and Windows machines. The loader installs a malicious VS Code extension (VSIX) masquerading as a legitimate Google service. Every time the user opens the code editor on macOS or Linux, the VSIX extension activates, and relaunches the infection-chain if it’s not already running. The persistence mechanism doesn’t work on Windows machines, however. After installing VSIX, the infection chain looks different, depending on what platform the target uses. The Linux and macOS attacks use a native Go binary that connects to the command-and-control (C2) infrastructure as a persistent remote access trojan (RAT). The Windows chain, however, runs a Node.js pipeline inside the editor's Electron process. Both use the same C2 infrastructure and exfiltration endpoints. Linux, macOS backdoors The Linux and macOS binaries are based on the open-source Overlord C2 framework - this is a legitimate red-team tool that automates covert infrastructure setup and management, and orchestrates post-exploitation activities. This, of course, also makes it a very handy tool for attackers. For this campaign, the North Koreans added three custom modules: browserlogin (Chrome and Firefox credential theft), companywallet (crypto-wallet stealer and exfiltration), and cleanup (anti-forensic removal of workspace artifacts). On macOS, Overlord first collects wallet extension data, browser profile artifacts, and standalone wallet directories, compressing them into a ZIP and uploading them to the C2 server. Five minutes later, the malware moves on to credential theft, using a second embedded Mach-O binary that displays a fake system dialogue and prompts the user to enter their password. The Overlord process validates the credentials, and assuming they are legit, the malware modifies keychain access-control lists across Chrome, Brave, Edge, Opera, Vivaldi, Arc, Yandex, and other Chromium-based web browsers, before extracting Safe Storage keys and sending all of the stolen goods - collected credentials, Safe Storage keys, and keychain data - to the attacker-controlled server. The backdoor also re-launches itself as root, using the stolen password. The Linux malware follows a similar pattern, first scooping up wallet-related data and sending that via ZIP to the C2 server before moving on to credential theft. It, however, uses Zenity, a standard GTK dialog tool, to create a prompt and collect victim credentials. This backdoor attempts to steal passwords from GNOME Keyring by spawning Python 3 processes for each browser, and ultimately re-launches itself as root using a swiped password. Windows attacks Windows attacks run entirely as JavaScript inside the editor's Electron process, which appears as Code.exe in Task Manager. The malware first steals wallet info, targeting 35 wallet extension IDs (MetaMask, Phantom, Rabby, Keplr, and others), 18 standalone wallet applications (Exodus, Electrum, Ledger Live, Monero, Solana CLI, Bitcoin, and others), and Firefox profiles. Next, it installs Python and executes a stealer (detect_malware.py) for each browser profile that collects a ton of credentials across Chromium and Firefox browsers, steals cookies from Chrome/Edge/Brave and uses COM Elevation Moniker to access credentials across these browsers protected by App-Bound Encryption. It also attempts to read locked databases using five cascade methods, and ultimately uploads all the secrets to the same endpoint before terminating. “UNK_DeadDrop activity suggests North Korea-aligned operations targeting developers for financial gain are maturing and evolving,” Naumaan and Rubio wrote. “The shift from active social engineering over social media platforms to conduct fake interviews to large campaigns of recruitment-themed phishing emails distributing links to malicious repositories could indicate an actor industrializing and scaling operations.” ®

The code WIRED identified is gone from the latest version of Meta AI, the companion app for the company’s smart glasses. Meta won’t say why or whether it’s coming back.

Microsoft’s GitHub temporarily disabled over 70 repositories after they were reportedly compromised by a worm in the latest open source supply chain attack. The code shack took down 73 repos within the space of 105 seconds after its alarms were tripped on Friday, June 5, after detecting signs of the Miasma worm infecting its projects, according to StepSecurity’s co-founder and CTO, Ashish Kurmi. “Our priority is to protect customers and the broader ecosystem. We temporarily removed some repositories as we investigated potential malicious content," a Microsoft spokesperson told us on Wednesday, two days after this story was originally published. "All of these repos have been restored after review. As part of our investigation, we notified a small number of customers who may have pulled down content from the affected repositories. We will continue to investigate, and if anything further is identified that requires customer action, we will reach out directly through our established support channels.” Users reported issues quickly on Friday, after visits to those repos all resulted in the same message displayed, indicating that they had been disabled due to terms of service violations. According to StepSecurity’s analysis, the attack kicked off after a compromised contributor account pushed a malicious commit to Azure/durabletask. The commit dropped configuration files that triggered remote code execution on machines when a developer opened the repo in an IDE or AI coding tool, such as Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and Cursor. Several developers soon reported broken CI/CD pipelines, a support thread showed, although a moderator said at the time this was due to “an internal management issue.” "The repo that most immediately caused issues was Azure/functions-action,” Kurmi wrote, used to deploy code to Azure. With it being taken down, every workflow that referenced Azure/functions-action@v1 stopped resolving. GitHub stepped in a few hours after the repos were infected by the malicious commit. Its automated detections kicked in and disabled the repos in under two minutes, in two separate waves. However, it was the borking of the durabletask family that hinted at the bigger picture, that the attack was indeed a re-opening of the previous Miasma worm attack that hit Microsoft last month. Microsoft’s durabletask PyPi package was a previous target of the Miasma worm on May 19. Within a 35-minute window, three versions of the package were uploaded to PyPi, which planted infostealers on developers’ machines, specifically sniffing out cloud secrets and developer tool configurations on Linux systems. Crucially, the re-targeting of durabletask suggests the tokens associated with the compromised developer account used to execute the PyPi attack were not fully rotated, allowing an attacker to gain access and push commits to GitHub, Kurmi said. It was either that, or the contributor was re-compromised through the worm's own propagation loop, or a different contributor's token was used but the attacker altered the metadata to make it look like a repeated attack. Security shop Snyk described Miasma as a descendant of the Mini Shai Hulud worm. It’s the same one that ravaged open source packages over at the npm registry, including Red Hat’s, earlier this month. Cybercrime group TeamPCP claimed responsibility for developing Mini Shai Hulud, which itself is named after an earlier worm of the same name, sans “mini.” However, because TeamPCP open-sourced Mini Shai Hulud, it’s difficult to tell whether it was also behind Miasma or if someone else took the reins on the follow-up project. StepSecurity also reported that two days before the Microsoft attack, the same worm was making a nuisance of itself at npm, compromising more than 50 packages, including a Vapi.ai SDK with more than 408,000 monthly downloads.® Updated on June 10 with new comment from Microsoft and the fact that the repos have now been restored.

Meta has asked a federal judge to hold Israeli spyware maker NSO Group in contempt of court after claiming it caught the surveillance vendor targeting WhatsApp users again despite a permanent injunction ordering it to stop. In a blog post on Monday, Meta said it had disrupted "NSO-linked social engineering attempts" after investigating reports from users. According to the company, the activity involved attempts to lure targets into clicking malicious links that redirected them to websites outside WhatsApp, as well as the creation of test accounts and groups on the messaging platform. "We successfully disrupted NSO-linked social engineering attempts after investigating user reports," Meta said. "They tried to trick people into clicking on malicious links to drive them to external websites outside of WhatsApp, similar to previously reported 1-click phishing campaigns linked to NSO." WhatsApp also published a handful of domains it linked to the campaign, including ikhwancast[.]com, ghazacast[.]com, and fr24cast[.]com, and said it was releasing indicators to help organizations identify related activity. The move marks the latest chapter in the long-running legal battle between Meta and the Israeli spyware maker. A US court found NSO liable in December 2024 for hacking WhatsApp users via its Pegasus spyware. In May 2025, a jury awarded Meta roughly $168 million in damages, but the judge later cut that to $4 million while issuing a permanent injunction barring NSO from targeting WhatsApp or its users. Meta, however, says NSO didn't get the memo. "Last year, WhatsApp made history by securing a landmark verdict and permanent injunction barring NSO Group ... from targeting WhatsApp and its users ever again," the company wrote. "Today, we're asking the court to hold them in contempt of that order." The company provided few technical details about the activity, such as when it occurred, how many users were targeted, whether any compromises were successful, or how it attributed the operation to NSO. Meta did not respond to The Register’s questions. However, the blog post adopts a hard line on the spyware industry than previous updates, repeatedly describing commercial spyware as a national security issue. "When a malicious company on the US government's Entity List continues to defy US courts, existing restrictions must remain firmly in place," WhatsApp wrote. "Easing them would undermine US national security and put American companies and billions of people worldwide who depend on secure communications at risk." If Meta's allegations are accurate, the episode suggests that a court loss is not enough to persuade a spyware vendor to leave a high-value target alone. ®

A WIRED timeline shows how dozens of governments, companies, and other organizations across Europe are moving, or planning to shift, away from US Big Tech.

Plus: Hackers use Meta’s AI bots to hack Instagram accounts, Anthropic helps NSA hackers, a decades-long GPS satellite mystery may have been solved, and more.

Oxford University students seeking work will be dismayed to learn that crooks have breached a second external platform provider for the university in as many months. The institution’s CareerConnect platform, provided by Group GTI, was the target of the intrusion, which exposed users’ full names and email addresses. Those who don’t use single sign-on (SSO) had their encrypted passwords leaked, too. CareerConnect forms part of Oxford University’s career services department, supporting students and alumni to find work opportunities. It is available to students, alumni, research staff, and recruiters. The same underlying technology powering the platform, which GTI markets as TargetConnect, is used by other universities in the UK and overseas, according to its website. OxfordUni said the May 28 attack was enabled by a “security vulnerability,” which has since been fixed. GTI has not publicly disclosed the security snafu itself, and did not respond to our requests for more information. The London-based tech company has not confirmed how many individuals were affected by the break-in, nor whether any data was stolen. It has also not explicitly stated which types of individuals were affected, although Oxford’s announcement listed “alumni, research staff, and employer users” as those who had their passwords forcibly reset following the attack. “There is no evidence that course information, uploaded files, appointment information, or financial information were involved in this incident,” the announcement went on to say. “GTI has stated this breach appeared to be focused on gathering credentials which may lead to phishing attempts.” The university did not list current students as among those affected, but told student newspaper Cherwell that names and email addresses might be compromised, and said the attack was entirely separate from the one which hit Instructure’s Canvas last month. Twice bitten Oxford University was just one of the circa 8,800 educational institutions affected by the mega breach at Canvas, a separate platform that’s also relied upon by schools, colleges, and universities. Seemingly timed by ShinyHunters to coincide with exam season, students across multiple countries were left without access to learning materials, tests, and grades at a pivotal time of the year. The scale of the attack was vast, affecting the usernames, email addresses, course names, enrollment information, and messages of up to 275 million students, teachers, and staff. The severity of the situation, coupled with the inopportune timing, led to Instructure “reaching an agreement” with ShinyHunters to prevent the criminal gang from leaking all the data online. In cyberese, this implies Instructure paid the criminals an extortion fee in exchange for their word that they would delete the stolen data. "We received digital confirmation of data destruction (shred logs)," Instructure said, adding "We have been informed that no Instructure customers will be extorted as a result of this incident, publicly or otherwise." ®

The threat is real. Unknown miscreants are exploiting a high-severity, zero-day bug in Cisco’s SD-WAN management software, and the networking giant hasn’t said when it will patch the flaw. Cisco issued an advisory on Thursday for the Catalyst SD-WAN Manager vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-20245, and it sounds like attackers have been exploiting this security failure for at least the last week. It’s due to a validation error - the software fails to properly validate user-supplied input - and an authenticated, local attacker can exploit the flaw by uploading a specially crafted file to vulnerable systems. From there, they can escalate privileges and execute commands with root privileges. The vulnerability affects all versions of the SD-WAN software, regardless of device configuration, and across all deployment types including on-premises, cloud-based, and FedRAMP-certified deployments. Switchzilla says it became aware of attacks against this vulnerability in June. “To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have netadmin privileges on an affected system,” the vendor said. “This would require valid credentials or exploitation of CVE-2026-20182 or CVE-2026-20127. Cisco is not aware of successful exploitation by other methods.” Both of these earlier SD-WAN security holes have also been hit by attackers in previous months. The good news: an attacker needs valid credentials to abuse the new hole. The bad news: exposed credentials aren’t hard to find (or buy) online. We don’t know the scope of exploitation or exactly when attackers began hitting this SD-WAN hole. Cisco declined to answer The Register’s questions, and instead sent us a statement via email. “Cisco recommends customers upgrade to the fixed software released in May 2026 for CVE-2026-20182 as a protective measure,” a spokesperson said. “A patch for this vulnerability will be provided on a future date. Customers needing assistance should contact Cisco TAC.” This latest bug is the sixth SD-WAN vulnerability listed as under attack since the start of the year, and the second zero-day in two months. The most recent is the one the Cisco spokesperson mentioned in an email to The Register. In May, Switchzilla disclosed a max-severity make-me-admin bug (CVE-2026-20182) affecting Catalyst SD-WAN Controller and Manager, and warned that attackers had already found and exploited the hole before it issued a patch. A month earlier, America's lead cyber-defense agency said that three Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager bugs (CVE-2026-20128, CVE-2026-20133, and CVE-2026-20122) were under attack, and gave federal agencies just four days to patch the security holes. Cisco fixed all three CVEs in late February, and in March warned of attackers abusing two of them. Also in February, the networking vendor patched a max-severity improper authentication flaw (CVE-2026-20127) affecting the same SD-WAN software, prompting a Five Eyes countries’ joint intelligence alert urgently warning defenders to patch it - plus an old SD-WAN vulnerability (CVE-2022-20775) - or risk root takeover. "Malicious cyber threat actors are targeting Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN used by organizations globally," the UK's lead cyber agency said at the time. "These actors are compromising SD-WANs to add a malicious rogue peer and then conduct a range of follow-on actions to achieve root access and maintain persistent access to the SD-WAN." And while this one isn't listed as under active exploitation (yet), on Wednesday, Cisco warned about a proof-of-concept exploit for CVE-2026-20230, a critical bug in its Unified Communications Manager that also allows attackers to gain root privileges. ®